A Checklist Before the Big Decision

Introduction

Before a major decision gains momentum, the most valuable question is often not “What should we do?” but “Are we solving the right problem in the right way?” Decision-quality checklists exist to test the problem frame before persuasive arguments, political commitments, or detailed analysis make the original framing difficult to challenge. Rather than predicting the correct answer, these checklists help decision-makers detect missing alternatives, weak evidence, hidden assumptions, and unjustified confidence. Research on decision quality consistently identifies framing, alternatives, information quality, and reasoning quality as core determinants of good decisions, regardless of the eventual outcome.[Decision Professionals+2Rockflow]decisionprofessionals.comDecision ProfessionalsDecision QualityThis framework proposed captures the quality of decisions, with the evidence that all decisions sha…

A useful checklist is therefore not a bureaucratic form. It is a structured attempt to answer a simple question: “If this frame is wrong, how would we know before committing resources?”

Why Leaders Need Pre-Decision Checks

Many poor decisions begin with a frame that feels obvious. Once a team agrees that a problem is caused by one factor, evidence gathering often becomes a search for confirmation rather than a search for understanding. Studies of cognitive bias show that professionals remain vulnerable to overconfidence, confirmation bias, anchoring, and related judgement errors even when they possess expertise and experience.[PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision…by V Berthet · 2022 · Cited by 305 — First, the literature reviewed shows…

This is why decision-quality practitioners distinguish between decision quality and outcome quality. A good outcome can result from a flawed process, just as a sound process can sometimes produce a disappointing outcome because of uncertainty. The quality check occurs before the outcome is known.[PMC Training]pmctraining.comPMC Training The Decision-Making Mistake That Costs Teams the MostDecision quality is an assessment of the reasoning process at the moment a decision was made.Read more…

A pre-decision checklist is especially valuable when:

• The decision is expensive or difficult to reverse.
• Stakeholders strongly favour one explanation.
• Forecasts contain substantial uncertainty.
• Time pressure encourages premature agreement.
• The proposed solution emerged before the problem was carefully defined.

In these situations, the checklist acts as a forcing mechanism that slows commitment long enough to examine whether the frame itself deserves confidence.

A Checklist Before the Big Decision

The following checklist focuses specifically on testing the problem frame, not on evaluating detailed solutions.

1. Have We Defined the Purpose Clearly?

A frame should state what success looks like rather than merely describe what is currently frustrating.

Questions to ask:

A useful warning sign is solution language embedded in the problem statement. For example, “How do we automate this process?” already assumes automation is the answer. A stronger frame asks what performance gap exists and what outcomes matter.

2. Have We Considered Genuine Alternatives?

Decision-quality frameworks consistently emphasise the importance of creative, workable alternatives because a decision with only one apparent option is often not a real decision.[Decision Professionals+2Sokkeldirektoratet]decisionprofessionals.comDecision ProfessionalsDecision QualityThis framework proposed captures the quality of decisions, with the evidence that all decisions sha…

Questions to ask:

• What are at least three fundamentally different ways to view this problem?
• If our preferred explanation were false, what else could explain the situation?

The objective is not to generate endless possibilities. It is to prevent the first framing from monopolising attention.

3. What Evidence Would Change Our Minds?

Weak frames often survive because teams collect supporting evidence but never identify disconfirming evidence.

Questions to ask:

This check helps counter confirmation bias and congruence bias, both of which encourage people to test whether their preferred explanation is correct rather than whether competing explanations might fit better.[PSA]professionalstandards.org.ukAs is.Read morePSAAdvice on biases in fitness to practise decision-making…June 10, 2021 — Congruence bias – tied to confirmation bias this is where t…Published: June 10, 2021

4. Are We Confusing Precision with Certainty?

Decision-makers often become more confident than their evidence justifies. Research identifies overconfidence as one of the most common and persistent biases in professional judgement.[PMC+2Economic and Business Review]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision…by V Berthet · 2022 · Cited by 305 — First, the literature reviewed shows…

Questions to ask:

A forecast stated as “12.7%” may appear rigorous while resting on highly uncertain assumptions. The checklist should force discussion of uncertainty, not merely calculations.

5. Have We Examined the Frame from Other Perspectives?

Problem frames determine what gets included and excluded from consideration. Decision education research describes a helpful frame as one that clarifies purpose, scope, and perspective.[decisioneducation.org]decisioneducation.orgHelpful FrameA decision frame has three components: (1) Purpose—what we hope to accomplish by this decision; (2) Scope—what to include an…

Questions to ask:

A frame that survives multiple viewpoints is generally stronger than one that depends on a single perspective.

Testing Alternatives and Evidence Quality

The strongest framing checks combine alternative generation with evidence review rather than treating them as separate activities.

One practical technique is to create competing problem statements and compare the evidence supporting each. For example:

The team then asks which evidence supports each frame and what evidence contradicts it. This prevents the discussion from becoming a contest between advocates of one preferred explanation.

Another useful approach is the pre-mortem. Developed by cognitive psychologist Gary Klein, a pre-mortem asks participants to imagine that a proposed plan has already failed and then identify the reasons why. By assuming failure rather than merely discussing possible risks, teams often surface concerns that would otherwise remain unspoken. Research and practitioner accounts suggest that this “prospective hindsight” approach improves the identification of weaknesses and hidden assumptions.[Psychology Today+3Harvard Business Review+3garyklein]hbr.orgperforming a project premortemHarvard Business ReviewPerforming a Project PremortemReprint: F0709A In a premortem, team members assume that the project they are planni…

For problem framing, the pre-mortem question becomes:

“Suppose we discover in two years that we framed the problem incorrectly. What did we overlook?”

The answers often reveal missing stakeholders, ignored constraints, weak evidence, or untested assumptions.

Using Checklists Without Turning Them Into Bureaucracy

A common criticism of decision checklists is that they can become mechanical exercises completed merely to satisfy a process requirement. That risk is real. Aviation and medicine demonstrate that checklists work best when they focus attention on critical failure points rather than attempting to capture every detail.[DIVA Portal]diva-portal.orgDIVA Portal Systematically Irrational Decision MakingDIVA PortalSystematically Irrational Decision MakingJune 17, 2016 — by J Duintjer · Cited by 1 — a 12-question checklist which decision m…Published: June 17, 2016

Several principles help preserve their value:

Keep them short. A framing checklist should usually fit on one page. If it requires extensive explanation, people stop using it.

Use questions, not boxes. The goal is discussion. Questions reveal assumptions more effectively than yes-or-no compliance checks.

Apply more scrutiny to bigger decisions. A minor operational choice does not need the same framing review as a strategic investment.

Encourage challenge. A checklist loses value if participants believe that questioning the frame is politically risky.

Review before commitment. The ideal moment is before resources, reputation, or public promises become tied to a particular answer.

The purpose of a decision-quality checklist is not to guarantee correctness. It is to increase the odds that reasoning begins from a frame that has survived serious testing. By exposing weak assumptions, unexplored alternatives, and unsupported confidence early, these checks improve the quality of judgement before analysis becomes attached to a potentially flawed definition of the problem.[Decision Professionals+2Rockflow]decisionprofessionals.comDecision ProfessionalsDecision QualityThis framework proposed captures the quality of decisions, with the evidence that all decisions sha…

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to A Checklist Before the Big Decision. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Decisive

By Chip Heath, Dan Heath

Provides practical methods for widening options, testing assumptions, and improving major decisions before commitment.

See on Amazon

Book

Thinking, Fast and Slow

By Daniel Kahneman

Explains cognitive biases, framing effects, overconfidence, and judgment errors that decision-quality checklists are designed to catch.

See on Amazon

Book

Thinking in Bets

By Annie Duke

Focuses on uncertainty, evidence quality, and separating decision quality from outcome quality.

See on Amazon

Book

Smart Choices

By John S. Hammond, Ralph L. Keeney et al.

Directly addresses framing, alternatives, objectives, trade-offs, and structured decision processes.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: Decisive Thinking, Fast and Slow Thinking in Bets

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Example eBay listing

My Problem-Solving Skills Are Fire Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

SearcheBay.co.uk: problem solving poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Problem Solving Cheat Sheet - Quick Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

SearcheBay.co.uk: problem solving poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Problem Solving Flowchart Funny - High Quality Glossy Poster

SearcheBay.co.uk: problem solving poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Problem Solving Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

SearcheBay.co.uk: problem solving poster

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: rockflow.com
Title: Why Decision Quality is important (and why it so easily falters)1
Link:https://rockflow.com/why-decision-quality-is-important-and-why-it-so-easily-falters/

2. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8763848/

3. Source: professionalstandards.org.uk
Title: As is.Read more
Link:https://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/Advice%20on%20biases%20in%20fitness%20to%20practise%20decision-making%20models.pdf

Published: June 10, 2021

4. Source: decisioneducation.org
Link:https://www.decisioneducation.org/decision-chain/helpful-frame

5. Source: gary-klein.com
Link:https://www.gary-klein.com/premortem

6. Source: diva-portal.org
Title: DIVA Portal Systematically Irrational Decision Making
Link:https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2%3A937319/FULLTEXT02.pdf

Published: June 17, 2016

7. Source: decisionprofessionals.com
Link:https://www.decisionprofessionals.com/who-we-are/decision-quality

8. Source: pmctraining.com
Title: PMC Training The Decision-Making Mistake That Costs Teams the Most
Link:https://pmctraining.com/articles-and-resources/decision-quality-vs-outcome-quality/

9. Source: sodir.no
Title: force dq lunch learn
Link:https://www.sodir.no/48f51b/globalassets/2-force/2020/seminars/01.17-organizational-decision-quality-value-creation-by-high-quality-decisions/force-dq-lunch–learn.pdf

10. Source: ebrjournal.net
Link:https://www.ebrjournal.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1338&context=home

11. Source: hbr.org
Title: performing a project premortem
Link:https://hbr.org/2007/09/performing-a-project-premortem

12. Source: psychologytoday.com
Title: the pre mortem method
Link:https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/seeing-what-others-dont/202101/the-pre-mortem-method

13. Source: cltr.nl
Link:https://cltr.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Project-Pre-Mortem-HBR-Gary-Klein.pdf

14. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3704204/

Additional References

15. Source: theuncertaintyproject.org
Link:https://www.theuncertaintyproject.org/tools/pre-mortem

16. Source: thedecisionlab.com
Link:https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/framing-effect

17. Source: jbsfm.org
Link:https://jbsfm.org/vol3no1/biases-in-managerial-decision-making–overconfidence–status-quo–anchoring–hindsight–[availability

18. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFV-lzIqfRA

19. Source: youtube.com
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sbsBlWVnfw

20. Source: sdg.com
Link:https://sdg.com/decision-quality/

21. Source: youtube.com
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL6uiALEdkk

22. Source: scrum.org
Title: three ai skills sharpen judgment
Link:https://www.scrum.org/resources/blog/three-ai-skills-sharpen-judgment

23. Source: investigationsquality.com
Title: Investigations of a Dog Decision Quality
Link:https://investigationsquality.com/2019/11/20/decision-quality/

24. Source: strategyunitwm.nhs.uk
Link:https://www.strategyunitwm.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/2018-12/SU%20guide%20to…the%20premortem.pdf